Weaponizing Public Assistance Programs
October 4, 2018

On September 21, DHS Secretary Nielsen, signed a proposed rule change which would establish new criteria for categorizing an individual as a “public charge,” essentially, decreasing the likelihood that those categorized as such may obtain legal residency in the United States.
Public charge has historically been used to select out a person who is primarily dependent on the government for more than half of their personal income. The proposed rule change would confer unto the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) enormous discretion over the categorization, while codifying a substantially expanded definition to include any person who uses public benefits for which they are eligible, such as Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and federal housing assistance. This is important to note because, in its most recent poll, the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding (ISPU) found that 18% of American Muslims report a household income above $100,000 (compared to 31% of Americans generally), but 33% make less than $30,000 (compared to 24% of Americans generally), a level at or below the federal poverty line, depending on household size, thus proving the significant impact this public charge rule is having on all communities.
The proposed rule is basically a wealth test that would essentially discourage immigration from any families whose household incomes would be less than about $62,750 a year. Additionally, The New England Journal of Medicine published projections that passage of the new rule may result in 1 million newly uninsured people. The proposed calculations for determining how the use of benefit programs would count against a person’s application are complicated, and are likely to be understood by many rather matter-of-factly: do not use public benefits if you wish to stay in the U.S. Taken in this way, the proposed policy stands to disincentivize immigration from lower-income families in poorer countries, while also chilling the use of social services used by immigrant families already in the country, lest they risk losing the chance to receive their green cards.
The proposal must be rejected as part of this administration’s broad-based effort to limit immigration. Public charge embodies the nature of the Republican-sponsored immigration bill which explicitly targeted immigrants without technical skills under the pretense of replacing family-based migration with merit-based migration.
MPAC unequivocally opposes the proposed rule change for the way in which it penalizes and pathologizes certain forms of social dependency, preferences immigration from wealthier families and disincentivizes the use of social services by those with the greatest need and the most vulnerable.
Stay in the know: Sign up for our policy updates, follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook.
IN THIS SECTION
- Policy Analysis
- Statements & Press
- White House Nominates Rashad Hussain as Ambassador for Religious Freedom
- The Blackhouse Foundation and MPAC’s Hollywood Bureau held their first-ever Television Screenwriting Lab for Black Muslim Writers.
- MPAC CONGRATULATES NUSRAT JAHAN CHOUDHURY ON HISTORIC NOMINATION
- GOP Blocks Coronavirus Bill
- Protect Rights During COVID-19
- Coronavirus Joint Statement
- Senate Passes Coronavirus Relief
- Iran Sanctions In COVID-19
- Historic Senate Relief Package
- Coronavirus Stimulus Problems
- Trump Immigration Suspension is Nothing but Cynical Opportunism
- House Introduces the HEROES Act
- Joint Action to Condemn the Murder of George Floyd
- Toward Pluralism: DA Rosen Must Retract His Whistleblower Complaint
- Supporting of Attorney General Keith Ellison Leading Prosecution for Murder of George Floyd
- Trump’s Executive Order on Census Is Unconstitutional
- MPAC Stands with the NBA Players
- What Muslims Want Heading into the 2020 General Election
- Declare Rittenhouse a Terrorist
- MPAC Firmly Denounces the Failure of the Criminal Justice System for Breonna Taylor
- There Is No Place For Violence in Civil Society
- Updates
- A Win Against White Supremacy
- Mosque Safety & Security
- How We’re Confronting White Supremacy
- Our Work on the Muslim Ban
- 2020 Muslim Voter Guide
- Responding to Covid-19
- Census 2020: What You Need To Know
- Human Security During COVID-19: Our Right
- Quarantine Webinars
- Make an impact in 1, 2, 3...
- Mark Kevin Lloyd is Unfit to Serve in State Department
- SoCal Muslims Show Gratitude To Frontline Workers
- DREAMERS are here to stay!
- A Ramadan Like No Other
- Creating inclusive content for kids & families
- National Muslim Task Force Recommendations for Ramadan During This Pandemic
- Ramadan Mubarak!
- Tale of Two Futures: American Muslim Life After the Election
RELATED STORIES
RELATED MULTIMEDIA
-
2012 Convention Videos
January 7, 2013 -
Al-Marayati interviewed on Viewpoint on Hate Speech
July 29, 2011 -
MPAC Convention Promotional Video
December 6, 2010 -
Dr. Maher Hathout on Elections
October 19, 2010
one-time or monthly donation.